Defining reasonable security
– THE QUESTIONS A JUDGE WILL ASK YOU AFTER A DATA BREACH presented by Chris Cronin. Establishing duty of care with DoCRA. CyberNext 2019 in DC.
Philipp Schneidenbach
If you are breached and your case goes to litigation, you will likely be asked to demonstrate “due care” and that your controls were “reasonable.” Many are surprised to learn that a breach by itself does not constitute negligence in most cases. But judges will ask a set of questions that help them determine whether your controls were reasonable. These questions bear a close resemblance to information security risk assessments; they both try to balance the likelihood and impact of foreseeable threats against the burden of safeguards. This presentation will explain judicial balancing tests, how they relate to regulatory definitions of “reasonable” risk, and how to conduct risk assessments that prepare you to answer the tough questions before you need to be asked.
Attendees will learn:
– How to define “reasonable” in a way that makes sense to business, judges, and regulators.
– How to design and run a reasonable security risk assessment that is meaningful to technicians, business, and authorities.
– Learn from case studies involving regulatory oversight, law suits that happened, and law suits that never happened.
Main photo source:IACD
Enhance your security strategy to address your changing working environment and risk profile due to COVID-19. HALOCK is a trusted cyber security consulting firm and penetration testing company headquartered in Schaumburg, IL in the Chicago area servicing clients throughout the United States.
